Choose the exact scheme
The check uses the rules for one call, round, and year. It does not use a general funder checklist.
How it works
One clear check before you submit.
Use GrantPreflight after the writing and internal review are done. It checks that your final files match the rules and each other.
Add every final file
Add the proposal, form, budget, CV, timeline, figures, host letter, ethics answers, and other required files.
Review the findings
Each finding shows the source in your application and the rule or fact behind it.
Fix the files and check again
Add the corrected files, see what changed, and keep a short record of the final check.
Three types of check
Use the right check for each problem.
A word limit needs an exact rule. A budget mismatch needs facts from more than one file. Some questions still need a person.
Exact checks
Facts that should always match
Files, sections, dates, totals, page limits, tables, figures, names, and other exact values.
Checks across files
Claims that appear in several places
Costs, roles, milestones, facilities, risks, ethics points, and promises made across the application.
Human review
Questions software should not decide
Scientific quality, unclear eligibility, costing choices, and any issue without enough evidence.
The result
A short list of issues you can fix.
No vague writing advice. No mystery score. Each finding has a priority, exact evidence, and a clear next step.
No single readiness score.A score can hide what was not checked. GrantPreflight shows the findings, gaps, and decisions instead.
Test with a past application
Do you have an application and reviewer comments?
A past application helps us test what GrantPreflight finds, misses, or gets wrong.